Skip to content
Timeblitzed - News, latest news, breaking news Timeblitzed - News, latest news, breaking news Timeblitzed - News, latest news, breaking news
Timeblitzed - News, latest news, breaking news Timeblitzed - News, latest news, breaking news Timeblitzed - News, latest news, breaking news
  • US
  • World
  • Politics
  • Sports
  • Opinion
  • Entertainment
  • Health
  • Lifestyle
  • US
  • World
  • Politics
  • Sports
  • Opinion
  • Entertainment
  • Health
  • Lifestyle
Close

Search

Newsom plans to sue Trump over mail-in voting after Supreme Court ruling
Sports

Newsom plans to sue Trump over mail-in voting after Supreme Court ruling

By Time Blitzed
August 25, 2026 3 Min Read
0

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

California Gov. Gavin Newsom announced plans to sue the Trump administration over its push to restrict mail-in voting after the Supreme Court allowed the administration to enforce challenged provisions of President Donald Trump’s executive order for “election integrity” while litigation continues.

The announcement sets up the next phase of the legal fight after the Supreme Court (SCOTUS) ruled 6-3 in favor of the Trump administration Monday, lifting an injunction that had blocked the order in 23 states ahead of November’s midterm elections.

SCOTUS stressed that its decision addressed the injunction rather than the ultimate legality of the order, leaving the door open to additional challenges.

Newsom criticized the decision in a statement released by his office.

JACKSON RIPS INTO SUPREME COURT COLLEAGUES’ ‘SERIOUS LEGAL ERROR’ ON TRUMP MAIL-IN VOTING ORDER

Governor Gavin Newsom speaks during a news conference in Sacramento, Calif. (Tayfun Coskun/Anadolu via Getty Images, File)

“The Supreme Court just let the Trump administration move ahead (for now) with its plan to disenfranchise voters across the country,” Newsom said. “California will be suing AGAIN to block these Orwellian rules from being implemented.”

Newsom’s office also highlighted two election-related bills moving through the California Legislature that the governor says would protect the state’s elections from interference.

According to the governor’s office, AB 282 would establish new felonies involving the seizure of ballots, election records or certified voting technology before election results are certified. SB 259 would establish criminal penalties for interfering with the delivery or return of mail-in ballots, including a felony carrying up to four years in prison in certain cases.

CALIFORNIA ACCUSED OF BLOCKING FEDERAL VOTER ROLL AUDIT AS DOJ ESCALATES PROBE OF ELECTION FRAUD CLAIMS

Donald Trump signs Voter Database Executive Order

President Donald Trump signs an executive order on mail ballots in March in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, D.C. (Evan Vucci/Reuters, File)

The governor’s office described the measures as an “Election Protection” package and said they build on election-related legislation Newsom signed earlier this summer.

The U.S. Postal Service (USPS) and Department of Justice said they would move to implement the revised mail-ballot restrictions following Monday’s ruling.

Trump’s executive order directs federal agencies to compile citizenship-based lists of eligible voters and directs the USPS to deliver mail-in ballots only to people appearing on approved lists.

USPS WOULDN’T DELIVER BALLOTS IN STATES THAT REFUSE TO FORK OVER MAIL-IN VOTER INFO UNDER PROPOSED RULE

Supreme Court building

The Supreme Court on Monday ruled in favor of the Trump administration to enforce challenged provisions in its executive order on mail-in voting. (Kevin Carter/Getty Images, File)

In explaining its decision, the Supreme Court concluded that the challenged provision directing the Department of Homeland Security to create and distribute state citizenship lists imposed obligations on federal agencies rather than the states themselves.

The court wrote:

“[It] directs the Secretary of Homeland Security to take appropriate action to create and distribute State Citizenship Lists. This provision is an internal directive from the President to a subordinate. It imposes no obligations on the States, so they ‘suffer no concrete harm from’ it, and without concrete harm, there is no standing.”

Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson dissented.

A representative for Newsom did not immediately respond to Fox News Digital’s request for comment.

Brittany Miller is a Fox News Digital breaking news writer and former Independent reporter who graduated from Syracuse University in 2023.

Tags:

courtmailinNewsomplansrulingsueSupremeTrumpvoting
Author

Time Blitzed

Follow Me
Other Articles
Ohio State coach Ryan Day addresses NFL players returning to college football: ‘We’re in a different world’
Previous

Ohio State coach Ryan Day addresses NFL players returning to college football: ‘We’re in a different world’

Enes Kanter Freedom, deemed to have ‘the potential to be a threat,’ barred from Sky arena after altercation
Next

Enes Kanter Freedom, deemed to have ‘the potential to be a threat,’ barred from Sky arena after altercation

No Comment! Be the first one.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Posts

  • Lindsay Clancy jury of women may not aid psychosis defense, says prosecutor
  • NYPD releases images of suspect wanted in deadly Bronx, Brooklyn shootings
  • Trump-endorsed candidate clears key hurdle in red state gubernatorial race
  • Newly released texts confirm Anthony Fauci and other ‘experts’ always knew mask mandates wouldn’t work
  • Dolly Parton refused politics and declined Medal of Freedom twice
Copyright 2026 — Time Blitzed. All rights reserved. Timeblitzed.com