Bargain Hunt star Charles Hanson used his ‘TV personality’ in video messages sent to his wife which disguised his controlling behaviour, she has told a court.
Rebecca Hanson gave evidence against her husband from behind a screen during her second day in the witness box at Derby Crown Court on Thursday, calling his messages ‘an act’.
Hanson, 46, is accused of grabbing, scratching and pushing his wife during a decade of violence, which began in 2012 when he allegedly held her in a headlock while she was pregnant.
Under cross-examination, his wife was led through a series of videos that Hanson had sent his wife which defence barrister Sasha Wass KC said demonstrated ‘an act of friendliness.
In the clips, Hanson is seen introducing his wife to people he met while working.
Ms Wass said: ‘He was anxious to please you most of the time, always trying to appease you and get in your good books.
‘Mr Hanson is talking to you on the screen, introducing his business associates, as an act of friendliness.’
Mrs Hanson replied: ‘He does a lot of these making videos of interviewing people, it’s the TV personality.
Bargain Hunt star Charles Hanson (pictured outside Derby Magistrates’ Court) is accused of grabbing, scratching and pushing his wife during a decade of violence
The auctioneer and his wife Rebecca are seen here outside their Derbyshire home
Hanson runs an auction house in Etwall, Derbyshire and is a regular on shows Bargain Hunt, Antiques Road Trip and Flog It!
‘He’s sending me a video but it’s a TV personality, it’s an act.’
The television auctioneer, also known for appearing on Flog It! and Antiques Road Trip, denies controlling or coercive behaviour, assault occasioning actual bodily harm, and assault by beating, allegedly spanning from 2012 until June 2023.
In another video shown in court, Hanson filmed inside the couple’s home where he had rearranged the furniture thinking his wife would be ‘pleased’, but Mrs Hanson told the court she thought his behaviour was ‘really controlling’.
She said: ‘He’s doing exactly what he wants without my consideration. He knew I would not be pleased. He got what he wanted knowing I did not want this.’
The court heard that after he moved the furniture, Mrs Hanson accused him of playing ‘mind games’.
She said: ‘I’m starting to fight back and stand up for myself. I’m at the end of my absolute tether and finally, I have got some guts to say some of this because I have been so controlled.’
Mrs Hanson denied that she was being ‘selfish, ungrateful and spiteful’ in her response to his video.
Ms Wass told the court that Hanson working late away from home was a ’cause of aggravation’ for the couple.
Hanson (pictured) met his wife through friends in 2008 and and wed two years later in a traditional service at All Saints’ Church in Mackworth, Derby, in front of 150 guest
The auctioneer, seen outside Derby Crown Court last week, has denied the charges he faces
She said: ‘You were not happy with your life at this time. Charles was successful but he was away a lot, wasn’t he?’
Mrs Hanson replied: ‘He was away a lot.’
Ms Wass continued: ‘He could be delayed for hours, couldn’t he, and come back later than promised, later than expected, and this was a cause of aggravation for you?’
Mrs Hanson said: ‘Yes. Work definitely came first. He was very late, constantly unpredictable.’
Ms Wass said: ‘You are feeling like you are just not getting enough attention from your husband. You wanted attention from him, didn’t you? There is nothing wrong with that.
‘That’s why you were fed up with your marriage, not him grabbing you or hitting you.’
Mrs Hanson denied that that was true.
The court heard that Mrs Hanson took photographs of her injuries and compiled a list of her husband’s alleged controlling behaviour to ‘gather evidence’ against him, and showed her father bruises on one occasion.
Bargain Hunt star Charles Hanson (centre) leaves Derby Crown Court on Tuesday
Ms Wass told the jury that an allegation from March 2020, when Mrs Hanson said her husband threw a phone at her that ‘hurt’, was ‘not a forceful throw’.
She said: ‘You said you wanted the landline and he threw it towards you so you could catch it.
‘It was not a forceful throw, there was no intention to hurt you, there was no intention to damage the phone.’
The trial continues.
