Skip to content
Timeblitzed - News, latest news, breaking news Timeblitzed - News, latest news, breaking news Timeblitzed - News, latest news, breaking news
Timeblitzed - News, latest news, breaking news Timeblitzed - News, latest news, breaking news Timeblitzed - News, latest news, breaking news
  • US
  • World
  • Politics
  • Sports
  • Opinion
  • Entertainment
  • Health
  • Lifestyle
  • US
  • World
  • Politics
  • Sports
  • Opinion
  • Entertainment
  • Health
  • Lifestyle
Close

Search

Judge Brinkema rejects DOJ bid to dismiss anti-weaponization case
Politics

Judge Brinkema rejects DOJ bid to dismiss anti-weaponization case

By Time Blitzed
September 18, 2026 3 Min Read
0

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

ALEXANDRIA, Va. — Department of Justice lawyers have asked U.S. District Court Judge Leonie Brinkema to dismiss a case connected to the Trump administration’s $1.776 billion “Anti-Weaponization Fund,” arguing that Attorney General Todd Blanche issued a formal recission order in August and has affirmed many times, including under oath before Congress, that the fund is dead.

However, Brinkema seemed skeptical on Friday.

“The issues that underly this case are still alive and kicking in my view,” Brinkema said.

“The real concern that lurks… is the concept of taxpayer money being used to promote particular political views,” Brinkema said, pointing to pro-life activists convicted of violating the FACE Act and others who attempted an “insurrection” on January 6th “to overthrow the legitimate election.”

CLINTON JUDGE INDEFINITELY BLOCKS TRUMP’S $1.776B ANTI-WEAPONIZATION FUND

U.S. District Judge Leonie Brinkema questioned whether the issues surrounding the Trump administration’s now-rescinded $1.776 billion Anti-Weaponization Fund remain unresolved. (Photo by Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images)

“That entity is gone,” said Brinkema, referring to the Anti-Weaponization Fund and agreeing that Blanche has said under oath at his confirmation hearings that the fund is dead.

“But is there a functional equivalent?” Brinkema said, referring to the DOJ’s ordinary Judgment Fund authority.

The Judgment Fund is a permanent U.S. Treasury account managed by the Bureau of the Fiscal Service that pays court judgments and DOJ legal settlements against the federal government. Brinkema called that fund “a less transparent structure” and suggested that some defendants convicted of FACE Act crimes have already received large payouts from the DOJ’s Judgement Fund.

JUDGE TEMPORARILY BLOCKS TRUMP DOJ’S NEARLY $2B ‘ANTI-WEAPONIZATION’ FUND

Close up of the DOJ podium.

Justice Department lawyers asked a federal judge Friday to dismiss a lawsuit challenging the Anti-Weaponization Fund, arguing Attorney General Todd Blanche formally terminated it Aug. 2. (Photo by Andrew Harnik/Getty Images)

Here Brinkema affirmed she was talking about the case of Paul Vaughn.

Vaugh, of Centerville, Tennessee, was convicted in January 2024 for his role in blockading an abortion clinic in Mount Juliet, Tenn., in March 2021. Vaughn ultimately received a pardon and a taxpayer-funded payout from the DOJ’s Judgment Fund which he has confirmed to Fox News is “seven figures.”

BIDEN ADMIN USED ABORTION GROUP DOSSIERS, INCLUDING PHOTOS OF MINORS, TO TARGET CHRISTIANS, DOJ REPORT REVEALS

DOJ sign on the edifice of the building.

Judge Leonie Brinkema said the issues underlying a lawsuit over the Anti-Weaponization Fund remain “alive and kicking,” despite the Justice Department’s insistence that the fund is dead. (Photo by Kevin Carter/Getty Images)

DOJ lawyer Andrew Block asked what remedy the plaintiff wants given asked “the fund is dead.”

Brinkema countered that although the case is nowhere near the remedy stage, “I think there are remedies.” She brought up the possibility of requiring a “neutral” person to oversee a fund, “not someone from the DOJ, which I see unfortunately as coerced,” in this matter.

“A proper, unbiased look… There’s been too much talk from members of the administration, which undercut [DOJ’s] position,” Brinkema said. “They contradict themselves all the time.”

Brinkema closed the hearing by telling both sides she intends to craft a new discovery order in the coming days, suggesting this case is far from over.

Jake Gibson is the Fox News Department of Justice and Federal Law Enforcement Producer.

Tags:

antiweaponizationbidBrinkemacasedismissDOJjudgerejects
Author

Time Blitzed

Follow Me
Other Articles
National Cheeseburger Day guide to picking the right cheese for melting
Previous

National Cheeseburger Day guide to picking the right cheese for melting

De Niro gets emotional as Poehler thanks him for being outspoken as Trump critic
Next

De Niro gets emotional as Poehler thanks him for being outspoken as Trump critic

No Comment! Be the first one.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Posts

  • Caitlin Clark returns after FIBA title as Kelsey Mitchell sets WNBA scoring mark in Fever victory over Tempo
  • Mountain lion caught on video running through the streets of San Francsico
  • Cuba power outage hits entire island as electrical grid collapses once again
  • Kappa Kappa Gamma transgender admission lawsuit heads to 10th Circuit
  • Yankees star Aaron Judge heads back to injured list weeks after returning from broken rib

About time Blitzed

Stay Informed. Stay Ahead.

Time Blitzed brings you timely news, important updates, and useful stories from around the world. We cover current events, technology, AI, business, finance, jobs, lifestyle, entertainment, health, and other topics that matter to today’s readers.

Our goal is simple: to make important information easy to find, understand, and follow.

Explore the latest stories and stay connected with what’s happening around you.

Info Links

  • About us
  • Contact us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
Copyright 2026 — Time Blitzed. All rights reserved. Timeblitzed.com